Nurse blames ‘sweaty sex’ with coke user for failed drug test

A NURSE has claimed she failed a drug test because she did not wash after having “very sweaty” sex with a cocaine user.

Tara Seymour, from Melbourne, Australia, appeared in front of a tribunal in March after failing a drug test last November.


Nurse Tara Seymour blamed ‘sweaty’ unprotected sex for a failed drug test[/caption]

She had previously admitted taking drugs on a Thai holiday and cocaine at a party — but denied consuming drugs before the test.

Seymour has been a nurse since 2011 at the John Fawkner Private Hospital in Coburg, where she has an excellent employment record, and was said to be passionate about nursing.

She told hospital authorities in the hours before the test she had sex with a “very sweaty” man without contraception, and that she didn’t bathe or use the bathroom between the sex and providing the urine sample.

The mother-of-one said she didn’t know the man was a drug user and denied knowingly breaching the condition of her registration.

When she gave her evidence she pointed to research where the possibility of such contamination was discussed.

She told the hearing she carried out household chores and went out for lunch before conducting her random urine test at about 2pm.

But, a chemical pathologist, Julia Chang, who appeared at the hearing said Seymour’s version of events was “highly improbable”.

Chang’s opinion was it requires 17 ounces of semen or sweat to get a similar result and said no sperm was detected in the urine sample.

Seymour’s suspected drug abuse was first drawn to the attention of the Australian Health Practitioner Regulation Authority back in 2014 but no action was taken.

A second anonymous source raised the alarm again in March last year and two months later a drug test found traces of methamphetamine, amphetamine and non-prescribed sedative zolpidem in Seymour’s hair.

The Board suspended her for a month and on return, placed her under supervision and imposed frequent drug tests, reported the Herald Sun.

She was eventually placed on less stringent and costly tests — but after the November test proved positive for cocaine — she was cautioned and the stricter testing program reinstated.

Seymour asked the Victorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal (VCAT) to review that decision.

In its findings, VCAT found Chang’s evidence persuasive and cast doubt about Seymour’s story.

VCAT accepted Seymour had undertaken the strict tests for 2 1/2 months without negative results, that there was no direct evidence she had worked while drug-affected or put patients at risk.

Lambrick said the aim was not to punish but to use the minimum regulatory force appropriate to manage the risk posed to protect the public and maintain community confidence.

While finding the less stringent testing insufficient, VCAT substituted the Board’s more onerous tests with less frequent ones that would still meet all the Board’s concerns.

“The screening remains random and would readily detect whether or not Ms. Seymour was compliant,” Lambrick found. The condition will be reviewed in three months.

A version of this story originally appeared on

We pay for your stories! Do you have a story for The Sun Online news team? Email us at or call 0207 782 4368


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *